This and That

So I woke this morning feeling distinctly incomplete – or rather, I felt that my most recent blog post wasn’t enough to carry me through the weekend. So I was lying in bed in that “I’m awake but not enough to get up yet” state and started pondering the possibilities. You know how sometimes you’re at a crossroads (minor or major) and not sure you’re headed in the right direction let alone making the right turns, and some sign appears? Well, call this the Saturday Morning of Signs!

Nothing came to me while I was in bed. There was only one thing I could do – I got up. Well, two more things: I made coffee and I took my coffee (Starbuck’s French Roast) up to my computer. I checked my email and then opened Twitter.

There they were – the signs! Dozens, maybe hundreds of them! I immediately started retweeting the more startling of them and then pulled myself back – this was not what I came here for. I was looking specifically for ideas for a post. But then I sat back and briefly admired how far I’d come: six months ago I didn’t know the difference between friending and following, and here I was being swept away by tweets I wanted to share and links I wanted to pursue.

First, there was Stuart and his Unlock the Door blog – and what was his topic of the day? “How I Write My Blog Post! How timely was that? Truthfully, it wasn’t earthshattering stuff, but the order and simplicity of Stuart’s ideas could take the most blocked writer through to getting something on paper (or computer screen). His description of his own approach was universal, and could be applied to all writing, not just a blog post.

So as I found myself pondering the simplicity of Stuart’s post, the prose and cons of simple writing, while continuing my quest for another tweet that could scream “idea” to me, I came across Mary’s KidLit.com posting on overwriting. I immediately went back through what I’d already written and considered whether I’d ever really talk that way and changed it to pass the “write like you speak” test.

I found myself drawn back to Twitter in search of at least one more idea. And what to my wondering eyes should appear? Top Ten Signs You’re Addicted to Twitter!
Actually, after I read them I breathed a sigh of relief, because I didn’t rise to that level (yet). I’ve rigidly refused to stream Twitter to my Blackberry (six months ago I wouldn’t have known what that meant). And I still can’t figure out how you really can follow the tweets of thousands. Of course, Twitter manages to limit you on that – another thing I haven’t figured out: what’s the point of Twitter’s limit on your follows, and how can you break through that limit to keep following new folks who sound interesting? How do you keep getting new followers if you can’t follow anyone new? Eventually the spigot of new follows slows (so I’ve noticed) when you’re not following anyone new. So I breathed a sigh of relief because clearly my questions indicate that I’m not experienced enough to call myself addicted to Twitter.

But still, there is a wealth of resources there that I don’t find on Facebook (although occasionally a nugget on LinkedIn, particularly in the Readers Entertainment group). So I continue to check it out and often become completely absorbed.

And voila! A new blog post – hopefully with some tidbits you may not have found had you not read this! Ah, the wonders of social media….

Posted in Blogs, Social Media, Writing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Balancing Your Day Job With Building Your Author Platform (and living the rest of your life)

If your image of yourself includes that you are a writer, then you must write. Ah, if only it could be as easy as it sounds. The reality is, no matter what our self-image, the bills must be paid and the food put on the table. Enter the necessity of a “real” job. Yes, there are those writers who are so successful that they don’t need a day job – and in fact may supply a day job to others in the form of hiring assistants and publicists, etc. There are those debut authors who, through talent, skill, probably hard work, and/or a huge dollop of luck, land a six-figure advance for their first book and (if they keep it up) never do another nine to five job. While the rest of us mere mortals may envy them, we know on some level that those folks are in the minority.

I read somewhere recently that, thanks to the ease and affordability of self-publishing nowadays, over a million books were published last year. A small percentage of those were published traditionally, and a microscopic number were penned by a best-selling and/or full time author. Some may not work outside the home because they can afford not to, but not due to their earnings from writing.

So how do you make time to work full time, commute, exercise (you should, you know), write, and build/maintain a presence on all forms of social media – and still make (some) time for family and recreation. The family time isn’t optional, especially if you have children. And fun and relaxation time is as important to your well-being as exercise (if you’re lucky, they are one and the same!).

I find myself trying to run faster and squeeze more in. I get up earlier to fit in exercise. I drive a little faster on my 1 ½ hour commute (each way). I’ve stopped browsing the farmer’s market on lunch breaks in favor of writing or doing something on social media. I hit the computer as soon as I get in the door after work instead of watching the news or having a leisurely glass of wine with my husband on the deck (summer) or in front of the fire (winter). I even tried taking a recorder with me to the gym so I could capture some of the brilliant (?) thoughts I have on the treadmill – but the results were unintelligible due to the jarring and heavy breathing. Evenings after 7pm are completely useless because I’ve been up and running full speed ahead since 2:30 am.

I keep thinking: there has to be a better way. But I haven’t found it. And I’ve still managed to complete three books so far and start a fourth one, though only one is published (so far) and is NOT on any best seller list. (Thus, the day job will continue.)

I’d love to hear how some of you balance competing priorities.

Posted in Blogs, Publishing, Social Media, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Keeping Up With the Jones’ (or at least the bloggers)

Do you value knowing what’s being blogged out there but find yourself too time-challenged to keep up? Help is on the say! I stumbled across Joel Friedlander’s blog earlier today. He has very generously pointed the way to some informative blogs, saving you the time to do a lot of searching. Of course, you can find links on Twitter and other sites, too, but usually in individual tweets, which can get tedious. Check it out!

Likewise, The Passive Voice offers some fascinating articles that include links to the likes of NYTimes and PC Magazine, as well as other blogs and websites.

Most of us are always looking for ways to save time but still stay on top of things. As I run across sites that help us do that, I’ll continue to share!

Posted in Blogs, Book Reviews, Publishing, Self Publishing, Writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Writers’ Resources

In a recent post I talked about my experience with YouWriteOn. I’ve continued to receive critiques from fellow writers, and to incorporate the suggestions that are repeated multiple times into revisions. What’s been interesting (if a little frustrating), though, is the number of times I receive precisely the opposite reaction to the same line or character or piece of dialogue.

It’s a reminder that all critiques include an element of personal taste and opinions, and need to be taken as such. When something is repeated consistently, it’s worth paying attention. But when one person says they love a line or a description or whatever and another says it ruins the flow or is not believable, etc., then you have to decide whether to accept or reject that piece of advice. It’s also a reminder that when you are sending your query or partial manuscript and it is rejected (even multiple times), it’s not necessarily a reflection on the quality of your writing, but on the preferences of the agent or editor.

However, try to be objective about the comments received multiple times. You may love a particular approach or combination of words, but if you hear repeatedly that it doesn’t work, it probably doesn’t. I’ve also realized that on this site some reviewers pay attention to basic writing flaws and some don’t. I know when I review I tend to be general if I’ve observed a lot of spelling or punctuation errors, or if the writing is just plain bad. (Someone can be a great storyteller but a poor writer). I have found myself suggesting on numerous occasions that the author have their work edited professionally to pick up on those issues, unless it’s one or two misspelled words or something similar that is easy for me to point out. I do believe that if you have read your own work numerous times you cease to see the minor spelling or punctuation errors that can then distract the more objective reader.

The more feedback you can receive on your writing, the better it will become, as long as you can sort through the inconsistencies.

And while I have your attention, I’d like to also mention another resource I’ve been finding useful. On LinkedIn there is a group called Readers Entertainment where some great (and practical) conversations have been taking place. One example (which has been going for over a week now) is “What’s the feel out there for pricing e-books at 99 cents? Brilliant marketing ploy or devaluing your work?” It sparked a rousing debate and some excellent marketing-related suggestions. If you’re not a member, you might want to consider joining.

Posted in Book Reviews, Publishing, Self Publishing, Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Character Creation and Development

I’m happy to welcome author Amy Tupper as my guest blogger today. Amy is the author of Tenderfoot and the soon to be published Blinded.

As an author, the creation of characters for a story is of vital importance. Each component the author chooses helps to define them, and with it, the story. But what does it take to create a character you love? Here’s what I did.

My goal was to create characters that excited me, hoping it would carry over to the readers. As is common in the writing of a book, the characters in Tenderfoot came first and the story shaped around them. My story features the main protagonist Jules, her love interest Andrew, and villain Nick.

I created a backstory for Jules which helped to explain who she was now: shy, sometimes hesitant , always wary. These characteristics are distancing. How to help the audience identify with her?

To make Jules accessible, I detailed her reactions to normal situations. The situations Jules faces in the beginning of the book are a baseline of normal college life, thereby known to the audience. As Jules interacts with her surroundings, I define how hard she works to fit in, showing that she makes a true effort. It’s not long before things go south for Jules. All she wants is to be normal yet she faces a situation where she will never be that. This adversity helps to humanize Jules. While she fits in well with her new friends, she finds herself in a place where she must accept what she is or run away from it. My hope was the audience would root for her in an unusual situation that is symbolic of the larger universal situation that we all go through – coming of age and accepting adult responsibilities.

Having a love interest humanizes Jules. She wants what we all want: to love and be loved by someone she trusts. Will she get the boy? Which one? Or will she freak out over what she is and run away?

Andrew, Mr. Love Interest, was harder to flesh out than Jules. His role is easily identified. Obviously, Andrew does not think of himself as a love interest. He’s the protagonist in his own story! (And also, my next book Blinded.) What qualities could I give him to break him out of the stereotype? I found out by creating a backstory as complex as Jules’. Andrew’s backstory became: he has a not-perfect family life and throws himself into his fencing competitions, a non-mainstream sport. He’s competitive, yet scared of letting anything get in the way of his athletic goals. Since Jules tells the story, her expression of her fear that she might hurt Andrew places a guy who is physically strong into a weak position which I hoped would generate sympathy.

Then there was the villain Nick. But is Nick really a villain? This is a question that is not answered until well into the story. Does he act as a villain? Yes, without question. Therein lies the dilemma. If he’s acting as a bad guy, how can I keep the audience from hating him? Better yet, how could I provoke the audience into both loving AND hating him?

I admit, this took a bit of tap-dancing. I started with characteristics normally thought of as annoying. Nick is a smart-ass, intrusive, and manipulative. To counter these negative associations, he is physically beautiful, mysterious, humorous, and takes actions that could only be interpreted as kind. The bonus with Nick? Like any character you love to hate, determining what he will do next added greatly to the story.

There came times in the plot as these three characters wove in and out of each other’s stories, when I had to stop and think hard and write a bit. I would take an issue and write about it from the view point of each of them to understand how they would respond. This helped me to keep the story true to the characters and their motivations. Also, it was a great way to get inside my characters’ heads.

Thus far, the feedback from readers tells me I was successful: I created characters they loved. This pleases me to no end. I love my wonderful but flawed characters. Sharing these feelings with an audience is incredibly rewarding as is the journey they undertake together.
Amy Tupper
Indie Author of TENDERFOOT
http://www.amytupper.net
http://www.facebook.com/amymtupper
www.twitter.com/amytupper

Posted in Writing | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

How Thick is Your (Writer’s) Skin?

I’ve had both the pleasure and the pain of discovering the youwriteon site over the past week. If you’re not familiar with this, it is a free site sponsored by Random House and Orion where writers can post up to 7000 words of their unpublished or self-published novel (5000 for short stories). In exchange for reading and reviewing the work of other participants, your own work is assigned to members to read and review. Once you have four reviews of your work, you can begin to see your ratings summaries, and once you have eight reviews, you can be included in the rankings along with others.

I first learned of this through my connection with Tom Winton on LinkedIn. His novel Beyond Nostalgia (99 cents on Amazon!) has done very well in the youwriteon rankings.
But it’s more than just the rankings that would make this site appeal. Although you need to sift through the review comments, when you see a particular criticism multiple times, you need to pay attention and consider revising your work accordingly. That’s what makes the site so helpful – you can make your work better. It’s a reality check. When you think you’ve made your story as good as it can be, getting objective feedback from multiple sources can either confirm that for you or point you in the direction of what you need to change.

Another appealing aspect is the chance to bring your writing to the attention of publishers. The most highly ranked books get reviewed by Random House and Orion, and authors have been known to land impressive deals as a result of being introduced to the publishers on youwriteon. They are the minority, of course. My reading experience so far has been mixed, with a few potential gems mixed in with a lot of really bad stuff. I’ve been surprised at the number of very dark, unpleasant stories.

So how has my book #2, Sentimental Journey, fared? Well, honestly, it has received mixed reviews – some very high praise along with some rather consistent criticisms. This process is not for the thin-skinned. Interestingly, many of the reviews include comments mirrored in feedback I’ve received historically from agents and publishers – “you write very well, but….” It seems I need to work on making my characters more believable and likeable. When you receive feedback like that fairly consistently, you really need to pay attention. So I’m going to make some revisions in the chapters I have on the site (oh, yes, that’s another nice thing – you can make revisions and re-post) and see if my revisions make a difference in the reviews. That’s the biggest value, after all, the chance to improve your writing.

Posted in Book Reviews, Publishing, Sentimental Journey, Writing | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

Querulous Queries

Three weeks ago I began the process of querying agents for my new novel, Sentimental Journey. Before I started sending them, I heeded a lesson from my previous attempts to secure agents for Walking In Dreams, (a middle grade novel which failed to find representation or a publisher), and Autumn Colors (a romance which failed on the agent search, was published by a small publisher, went out of print in six months, and subsequently self-published).

I knew I needed an agent for “Sentimental Journey” if I wanted any chance at a major publishing house. And I knew how important the query letter is to getting a foot in an agent’s door. So I had my letter critiqued three separate times. Why more than once, considering I was using the paid service of professional editors/agents? Why did I not have total faith in one? Because this time I was determined to come up with a letter that would grab the attention of multiple agents, with the obvious goal of finding one who asked for the entire manuscript and fell head over heels in love with it.

Different agents are, I learned, turned on (and off) by different approaches to a query. The first critique cleaned out the most blatant problems with my letter. But I knew that wasn’t enough. So I took advantage of a service offered by a well-known editor, and took the letter to another level. But I still wasn’t convinced it was where it needed to be.

I toyed with the idea of sending it to Query Shark. But the risk of that was it could take months to be considered, and it might never be reviewed. I did send it to the BookEnds blog, and perhaps it will appear there – although I’m sure they get so many that the odds of yours being selected might approach the odds of winning the lottery.

So I paid an agent who offers this service. Once again, her feedback resulted in a more concise and targeted letter.

BUT…
If the letter was as great as it should be, considering the editing and critiquing it underwent, I would expect to receive at least a request or two for additional material by now. Instead, I’ve received two rejections (out of 12 sent), silence from two whose websites indicated if you don’t hear from them in 2 weeks you can consider it a pass, and the remaining 8 are hanging out. I’ve continued to send to additional agents. But I have to admit to discouragement.

Thin-skinned, you say?

Well, it’s not that kind of discouragement. It’s facing the reality that in spite of what I’ve done to arrive at as perfect a query as possible, it’s still not good enough. And I don’t know what to do next. Suggestions are welcome!

Likely I will just keep trying until I exhaust my list of agents. But meanwhile, I’d love feedback on the letter content from others who have been more successful. So here is the body of the letter, and anyone out there who wants to is welcome to weigh in on its positives and negatives:

“Sentimental Journey is a 98,000-word women’s fiction. My style has been described by writing instructors as having similarities to Anne Tyler, with some Maeve Binchy, voice of Barbara Delinsky, and the emotional appeal of Nicholas Sparks.

Meredith Fields’ formerly placid suburban life is shattering piece by piece. Keith, her husband, says he’s fallen in love with his young assistant, and wants a divorce. She feels guilty over placing her mother, Katherine, in a nursing home. An accomplished author, she’s bored with her romance books, and has a tight deadline for her next book – which she hasn’t quite started.

As Meredith sorts through her mother’s house and finds clues to the woman’s shadowy past, she recognizes much of her mother in herself. She begins to understand why her mother related so poorly to her children, and is shaken by parallels in her relationships with her own children. Her growing compassion for Katherine’s difficult life becomes the catalyst for her new novel, Hope’s Illusion, the first two chapters of which are included in Sentimental Journey. Meanwhile when Meredith finds a journal she kept in her twenties, she is reminded of the love she once felt for Keith, and the extent of his loss settles in. A series of crises forces them to confront their relationship, showing Meredith the way to restore her spirit and mend her shattered life.

I am the author of Autumn Colors, a romance, released earlier this year. I’ve also published several articles in professional journals, an article in Runners’ World, and contributed chapters for two nonfiction books. More information and excerpts from Autumn Colors can be found on my website (www.dawnlajeunesse.com).

Thank you for your time and consideration.”

Have at it, readers!

Posted in Agents, Autumn Colors, Publishing, Sentimental Journey, Writing | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Recipe for a Manuscript

For today’s post, please welcome my friend and fellow writer, Sharon Delaney. Her books are action-packed, well researched and always involve a dog-hero – who wouldn’t love that? Here she shares insights and advice on taking your manuscript from planning through completion:

Writing is a lonely business. It’s done with the maestro absolutely alone with just the computer for company. For me, it is the calling of my life. I can’t envision living without it. If I never sell another book, I will continue to write.

I’ve had people say to me, “teach me how to write.” The finer points of writing can be learned in a seminar or workshop. However, the first point of order is to have something to say. You can’t sit down and write a manuscript unless you have a message. It would be like going for a Sunday afternoon drive on a Los Angeles freeway, just for fun. A Sunday afternoon drive is for people who want to look around. Unfortunately, no one else on the freeway wants to look around, they have a destination in mind. If there is no destination when you write, people will be honking for you to get out of the way and road rage will set in. Eventually you will be in a wreck and it won’t be fun any more

When you map out a book, first get organized. My first step is to determine the story I wish to present, then tell myself the story and prepare a writing synopsis of between twenty to thirty pages. Each paragraph in the synopsis becomes a chapter. Then research any issues you plan to incorporate into the novel. Research is critical. If you haven’t been to the location of one of your scenes, visit it in books or on the computer and be prepared to describe it. Details bring the story to life. `

Organizing the work is critical. I begin a project by preparing three-ring binders. One
holds the research so I know where to look when I need it. I make extensive hand-written notes of the particular points I want to bring into the book to make it seem more realistic. After all, if the readers have been there, it makes them more interested in the book if it describes what they know. Another binder is ready to receive the manuscript itself.

Then sit down at the computer and get started. When my fanny hits the chair on day one, the first thing I say is, “Goodbye world, I’m going away for a while.” Pull up the writing synopsis, save it in the computer as the novel (I name it Novel Name, Chapters 1-50) and save it as a separate document from the original synopsis. Then begin to tell the story. Write down whatever comes to mind. If it’s goofey, it will be edited out later. Some points will be developed in more depth. Whatever the style is, tell it from the beginning to end, or pick out specific chapters to develop first. But just write. Don’t get out of that chair until the day’s allotment of words is met. I set aside a minimum of four hours a day to spend at my computer, and I guard that time jealously. While I’m writing, I don’t answer the phone or open my door. I find that the hours I spend writing fly by, and when I think I’ve been there twenty minutes, my four hours is up. I sometimes get so lost in the computer it feels like it makes a sucky sound when I back out of it. In the end, I read through the book time after time, after time, after time – until I have the book almost memorized. I am looking for continuity, grammatical errors, anything that needs to be cleaned up.

And that’s how I write a book – the recipe for a completed manuscript. Be proud that you’ve accomplished it. I can’t tell you how many people start a book and never finish it.

Being in the publishing business is exciting – and frustrating, and hard work. In every aspect of it, make yourself comfortable and enjoy it. Baby yourself with cool drinks in the summer and hot chocolate in the winter, and buy yourself presents for a deadline met.

If publishing is a business endeavor you would like to pursue, I encourage you to do it. And on every step of the way, I wish you well.

Sharon Delaney, Wordsmith
The Grass Whispers
Available on
Amazon.com
Professionalwriter@ymail.com

 

Posted in Publishing, Self Publishing, Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Write Tight – The Art and Skill of Efficient Writing

Whether you’re writing an article, a short story, or a book length fiction or non-fiction, your product consists of smaller pieces – paragraphs, sentences, phrases, clauses, words. The clarity and impact of your message depends on precise selection of words and word combinations. When you use more words than you need, you risk losing your reader’s attention and confusing your meaning.

Many new writers use more words than needed to make a point or tell a story. But excess words can also be found in early drafts of more experienced writers.

Let’s use my writing as an example. Here is the first draft of the opening paragraphs of this article:

“As a runner, I know that being able to perform well at long distances requires
that I tighten up on my form and speed at shorter distances. The ability to run
long distances and for a long time comes from doing progressively longer runs
to build endurance. In other words, in order to run long and well I have to
combine both quality short runs and progressively longer runs.
 

Writing is similar. It doesn’t matter whether you’re writing an article, a short story,
or a book length fiction or non-fiction, your creative product consists of many
smaller pieces – paragraphs, sentences, phrases, clauses, words. How clear your
message is and the impact that message makes depends on very precise selection
of the best words and word combinations, and then applying them frugally. In
other words, when you choose to use more words than you really need, the end
result can be taking the chance of losing your reader’s attention as well as
confusing your meaning.
 

One of the most common errors writers make is choosing to use more words than they
really need to make a point or tell a story. Usually it’s a new writer, but excess
words can also be found in early drafts of more experienced writers.” 

See the difference? The original version is mired in extra words, and the result is a tedious read. Let’s look at common culprits in the word-heavy version.

Edit Out the Non-Essential

Look at the first paragraph of the original version. As a runner, I’d hoped to use a running analogy to drive my point home. But an analogy is valuable only when the reader can relate to it. Writers are not all runners. The average non-runner reading that first (and most critical, to hook the reader) paragraph would likely glaze over or be turned off entirely. The running analogy adds nothing to the message. It needed to be edited out – no
matter how painful that was!

Don’t Waste Words /Write Clearly So You Only Have to Say It Once

Although the first paragraph was deleted, something further can be learned from it:

Italicized Version: In other words, in order to run long and well I have to combine both quality short runs and progressively longer runs.

Comment: Had this paragraph remained in the article, “In other words,” would have been a clue to repetition.

Make every sentence add something new, and every word a solid building block for your sentences. You can eliminate excess words further by studying the parts of your sentences. Critically assess clauses and reduce them to phrases. The phrase “when you choose to use” was easily pared to “when you use.” And “the end result can be taking the chance of losing…” is much cleaner as “you risk losing….” Then reduce those cleaner phrases to single words when you can.

These are the leading causes of writing that needs tightening. But there are others.

Avoid empty openers (also called expletives)

Examples include “there is,” and “there were.”  Reword the sentence with a stronger beginning:

Empty opener: There were medals awarded to every finisher of the race.

Revised: Every finisher received a medal.

Use plain language and keep it simple

Don’t try to sound like a bureaucrat or a Supreme Court Judge. Write plainly. Your message will be clearer and more readers will understand it. One way to do this is to make your writing more conversational. Write the way you speak. Then read what you’ve written out loud. Does it sound natural to you?

Try always writing in the active voice

The passive voice uses more words and isn’t as strong as the active voice. For example:

Passive: The order was delivered to Allen by FEDEX.

Active: FEDEX delivered the order to Allen.

Limit modifiers

Instead of using words like really, very, or extremely to intensify another word, try replacing the two words with one stronger word.

Modifier: Sara was extremely happy.

Revised: Sara was thrilled.

It’s harder and more time consuming to write concisely. You have to think about every word you use. You review draft after draft searching for the phrases you can tighten, the words you can cut. We should be getting better at writing tightly, as we gain experience with texting and Tweeting. But we persist as wordily as in the past in much of our writing away from electronic venues. Cutting words is painful. Every word you write is important
to you on some level, and throwing each one away is like discarding a piece of yourself – like my running analogy.

But we all want to write well. Writing takes discipline, and this is just one aspect of that discipline. In the end, when you receive that acceptance from a magazine or publisher or agent, isn’t it worth it?

Posted in Publishing, Uncategorized, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Practical info about traditional publish

Practical info about traditional publishing and query critiques! http://ow.ly/5GmqO

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment